A cumulative evaluation report of former Superintendent Risha VanderWey by the Montezuma-Cortez School District RE-1 Board of Education shows mostly low rankings in performance.

The school board assessed VanderWey’s performance across six objective standards: student growth and achievement, organizational leadership, district operations and financial management, communication and community relations, human resource management, and professionalism.

The report was completed Jan. 15, three days before the school board’s January meeting in which an executive session was held to discuss VanderWey’s position. VanderWey took part in a portion of the session.

The Journal acquired the evaluation report through a Colorado Open Records Act request. The district noted that it considers individual evaluations not to be public record.

The Journal is awaiting documents from a formal request for board members’ electronic and written communications that discussed VanderWey in January.

VanderWey’s contract spanned from July 1, 2021, to June 30, 2023. Her annual base salary was $125,000 for the 2021-22 school year, with an annual provisional increase of 2% of the previous year’s base salary thereafter.

The school district announced Monday that VanderWey had resigned effective Jan. 21. A letter from the school board, emailed to The Journal on Saturday, cited “philosophical differences of short and long-term goals” between the board and VanderWey.

An earlier letter from Board President Sheri Noyes on Jan. 24 announced VanderWey had been placed on administrative leave.

Each of the six objective standards in the evaluation were broken down into further key performance evaluations, but those specific evaluations were not released.

Each of the seven board members offered one score per category.

Board directors are:

Below are the overall performance rankings in each of the six overarching categories.

Altogether, VanderWey was given five “proficient” scores, one “between needs improvement and failing” score, 16 “needs improvement scores” and 19 “failing” scores.

Three board members found VanderWey’s overall performance needed improvement in student growth and achievement. One board member ranked her as proficient, while three classified her as failing in the category.

Four board members found VanderWey’s overall performance needed improvement in the area of organizational leadership. Three classified her as failing.

Two board members found VanderWey’s overall performance needed improvement in operations and financial management. One board member ranked her as proficient, while four classified her as failing.

Three board members found VanderWey’s overall performance needed improvement in communication and community relations. Four classified her as failing.

Two board members found VanderWey’s overall performance needed improvement in resource management. One board member ranked her as proficient, while three classified her as failing. One overall score was missing.

Two board members found VanderWey’s overall performance to need improvement in professionalism. Two board members ranked her as proficient, one rated her performance as in between needs improvement and failing, and two classified her as failing.

The school board will appoint staff to fulfill VanderWey’s duties at its next meeting, on Feb. 22, who will do so until the board hires a new superintendent.

VanderWey has not responded to The Journal’s requests for comments.