To date, the agreements have been made without relinquishing Afghan military authority or allowing the Taliban to expand influence, coalition officials say.

“We have not seen a geographic expansion of insurgent influence as a result of local agreements, nor have we identified areas in which the Taliban has increased its capabilities or established local safe havens as a result of such agreements,” said Matt Sherman, a coalition political adviser.

Still, coalition commanders are watching the agreements carefully, according to a Pentagon report on Afghanistan. “It’s important to look at (the agreements) on a case-by-case basis,” Sherman said in an interview from Afghanistan.

The agreements, some of which are little more than temporary cease-fires, carry the potential to be damaging if Afghan commanders “relinquish core responsibilities and local security standards when they enter into an accommodation with insurgents,” the report says.

Agreements should not be seen by Afghan commanders as an excuse to reduce patrols or remain in garrison, giving the Taliban freedom to roam, said Said Jawad, a former Afghanistan ambassador to the United States.

Many insurgent groups that fight under the banner of Taliban are little more than tribes fighting over local grievances and are distinct from hardcore Taliban militants with a broader agenda.

The coalition would regard any accommodation with al-Qaeda or its affiliates as a “red line,” Sherman said.

The report said cease-fire agreements have increased but remain “rare.” However, the cease-fire agreements will likely increase as the number of coalition forces declines and local Afghans seek out their own resolutions.

“In many ways, this is about us adapting to a new security environment,” Sherman said.

The agreements haven’t reached anything approaching critical mass.

© 2013 USA TODAY. All rights reserved.