The article ignored the “state of the co-op” address and neglected to outline board candidates’ visions for the DNF’s future. It overlooked useful information about the structure in place since 2008 that guides the DNF board – policy governance – which directs the board to create policy and leaves the policy strategy and implementation to the general manager and staff.

It stated, “Last year, many of its 1,400-plus members were miffed when they learned the current board was negotiating a merger” without consulting general members. “Some” more accurately describes the amount of those disgruntled as only two DNF owner-members authored a petition – which 200 of DNF’s 1,400 owner-members signed – to remove all seven board members from their volunteer service. A legal review found the petition in violation of DNF bylaws as the bylaws require mediation first to resolve differences.

Neither petition author responded to certified letters from the board to participate in mediation.

DNF bylaws do not allow major decisions about DNF’s assets to be made without a vote by owner-members. Last summer at a special members’ meeting, the board did outline a series of owner-member meetings to discuss the possible merger, but the petition ended discussions, halting the democratic and cooperative process set in place.

The story incorrectly stated the cost of DNF ownership as $100 annually. Actually, a one-time $100 equity payment buys a share, giving an individual owner or family one vote in DNF decisions.

Finally, the story directed readers to a website outlining merger “negotiations” created by a petition author but neglected to mention the documents available on the DNF website at www.durangonaturalfoods.coop/about-food-coop/coop-board-of-directors.

Our community needs accurate and unbiased reporting. I invite the Herald to serve a constructive role and accurately report the ongoing discussions that will take place between owner-members about the future of DNF Co-op.

Jules Masterjohn

Durango