{"id":73471,"date":"2016-08-03T01:47:24","date_gmt":"2016-08-03T07:47:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/durango-will-say-goodbye-to-the-arc-of-history\/"},"modified":"2016-08-03T07:47:24","modified_gmt":"2016-08-03T07:47:24","slug":"durango-will-say-goodbye-to-the-arc-of-history","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/durango-will-say-goodbye-to-the-arc-of-history\/","title":{"rendered":"Durango will say goodbye to the Arc of History"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

\"The
The city of Durango installed Tom Holmes\u2019 Arc of History sculpture in 2014. The $28,000 piece of public art at the U.S. Highway 550\/160 intersection was the target of controversy and hijinks. The sculpture was decorated as a dinosaur and dragon. In July 2015, vandals inflicted serious damage. This week, the city\u2019s Public Art Commission decided to remove the Arc rather than pursue repairs.<\/span>Courtesy of Tom Holmes<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/p>

<\/p>\n

The Arc of History at the U.S. Highway 550\/160 intersection is going away.<\/p>\n

On Tuesday, the Durango Public Art Commission decided to remove the controversial piece of public art after discussing options, said Sherri Dugdale, assistant to the city manager.<\/p>\n

The decision was reached in part because of the prohibitive cost to repair vandalism damage, according to a release from the city. But the art commission was concerned about the message that might send.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe wanted to be careful that we weren\u2019t sending a message to the community that said, \u2018Well, if you don\u2019t like a piece, just go ahead and damage it and we\u2019ll replace it,\u2019 that\u2019s not what we are doing here, that\u2019s not the message,\u201d Dugdale said.<\/p>\n

The Arc was installed in July 2014 and was significantly damaged about a year later by an unknown vandal or vandals.<\/p>\n

\u201cIf you walk up and look up at those stones, all of them, with the exception of the ones on the ends that are really hard to get to because they are so high, are damaged,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n

The commission discussed multiple ideas about how to best restore the piece and decided that the only way to maintain the integrity of the artwork was to commission the original artist, Tom Holmes, for the job.<\/p>\n

But estimates for the restoration came in well over the original $28,000 spent for the Arc, Dugdale said. \u201cWe asked for estimates from the artist and the first estimate came in around $38,000, and the next estimate, I think, was $5,000 or $10,000 above that.\u201d<\/p>\n

The estimates were intended to cover potential expenses and ensure he would not be liable for any additional cost that might come up during the process, Holmes said. This was done directly at the request of the city.<\/p>\n

\u201cSherri Dugdale requested me specifically to give a high estimate for insurance purposes only, which I did, because there are unknown costs,\u201d Holmes said.<\/p>\n

Dugdale said that was not true.<\/p>\n

\u201cHe called me for advice on the value of the piece, and I said, \u2018You need to give them an accurate estimate of what you think the cost to replace would be,\u2019\u201d Dugdale said.<\/p>\n

Holmes said he wanted $8,000 for his artist fees, with an additional $2,000 contingency, which is within the range of his normal fees for art pieces.<\/p>\n

The rest of the cost would fall to the city, including tools, vehicle rental, materials, room and board, airfare and police presence during the installation, according to a copy of the estimate provided by Holmes.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe estimate was only that,\u201d he said. \u201cIt was never followed up on.\u201d<\/p>\n

An additional cost came in the form of traffic control from Colorado Department of Transportation, which was quoted at $5,000, Holmes said. That fee was not part of the original sculpture installation because the road had traffic control during the construction of the new intersection.<\/p>\n

On May 4, the commission sent Holmes a letter offering $28,000 for the restoration after the estimates came in, but received no response, Dugdale said. \u201cI don\u2019t think any of us can justify paying more to restore this artwork than it cost us just two years ago.\u201d<\/p>\n

The letter says that the sculpture had been determined to be a total loss by the insurance carrier, the Colorado Intergovernmental Risk Sharing Agency, because of the damage received and valued it at $28,000.<\/p>\n

The letter offers this amount to Holmes to restore the Arc \u201cincluding all expenses, travel, permits, etc.\u201d It goes on to say that the city is willing to make services and equipment available to assist in the restoration, but the budget cannot exceed the amount provided by insurance.<\/p>\n

Holmes says he did not get a letter from the city or the commission.<\/p>\n

\u201cThere is no letter here, there never was a letter sent, for them to not call me up and say, \u2018Hey Tom, did you get that letter?\u2019 There\u2019s a reason that no letter showed up here, because they had a predetermined outcome.\u201d Holmes said.<\/p>\n

Holmes provided an email he said he sent May 1 inquiring about the desire to repair the Arc before the end of the year, and he said he received no email response.<\/p>\n

\u201cNot a single phone call from anyone in Durango speaks volumes as to the real agenda here. Which was, don\u2019t repair to gain back support for those involved and blame Tom Holmes for it,\u201d Holmes said in an email.<\/p>\n

While initial public response to the piece was less than favorable, the art commission believes the public stood with the commission against the vandalism that precipitated this week\u2019s decision, Dugdale said. \u201cSentiment was \u2018we might not like it personally, but it\u2019s not right that somebody just damaged the piece.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n

In the months after the installation of the Arc of History, The Durango Herald received many letters to the editor expressing a wide range of opinions.<\/p>\n

Betsy Janeczek expressed that perhaps there were better expenditures for the funds spent on the piece of art.<\/p>\n

On Friday, Janeczek said she is concerned about what the city might replace the Arc with, and if it will add to the confusion of the relatively new U.S. Highway 550\/160 intersection by distracting drivers.<\/p>\n

She still thinks the city could find a better use for the money than replacing the Arc.<\/p>\n

\u201cThose free concerts have been a huge gift to the community, they\u2019re wonderful, that\u2019s an example of a positive thing, a good use of money for people,\u201d she said. \u201cI certainly wouldn\u2019t put any more money into that sculpture. Nor would I replace it.\u201d<\/p>\n

Another letter by Tierney Skahill expressed that while she wasn\u2019t the biggest fan of the design, she appreciated the sculpture because of the way the public interacted with it, in the form of the decorations and letters to the editor.<\/p>\n

\u201cI like Durango because we like to play with poor public art, whatever it may be, and I think that the best thing about our town is we make fun of ourselves and we play with our art, we decorate it, we have fun with it and it makes us laugh and that is priceless.\u201d Skahill said Friday.<\/p>\n

City crews will remove the sculpture in the near future and there are no plans to replace it, Dugdale said. But the site remains on the city\u2019s Art Location Master Plan, she said.<\/p>\n

The city has the $23,000 from the insurance company \u2013 $28,000 minus a $5,000 deductible \u2013 to use at its discretion, which could be used to commission a new piece of art for the intersection, she said.<\/p>\n

\n

Arc of History timeline<\/h4>\n

July 2014: Arc of History installed.
\n October 2014: dinosaur head appears on sculpture.
\n November 2014: teen bandits pilfer dinosaur head and then turn it over to police, and it is claimed by artist Benjamin Foisel. Resident Karen Zink bids $5,000 on dino head in auction, money is donated to Durango Arts Center.
\n February 2015: Chinese dragon head appears on sculpture, which is removed by police.
\n March 2015: replica \u2018arcs\u2019 appear alongside sculpture.
\n April 2015: egg nest appears beneath Arc.
\n May 2015: baby dinos appear to have hatched.
\n July 2015: sculpture substantially damaged by vandals.
\n August 2015: Durango Public Art Commission agrees to restore Arc.
\n March 2016: Easter eggs and bunnies appear under sculpture.
\n July 26: Durango Public Art Commission votes to remove Arc.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

estimated $38,000 to repair vandalized work<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":73472,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[246,13,2598,4747],"naviga_topic":[],"class_list":["post-73471","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","tag-arts-general","tag-frontpage-lead","tag-sculpture","tag-slideshow"],"acf":[],"author_name":"dh_admin","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73471","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73471"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73471\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/73472"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73471"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73471"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73471"},{"taxonomy":"naviga_topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/naviga_topic?post=73471"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}