{"id":70345,"date":"2016-10-26T03:33:43","date_gmt":"2016-10-26T09:33:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/amendment-71-creates-odd-bedfellows\/"},"modified":"2016-10-26T09:33:43","modified_gmt":"2016-10-26T09:33:43","slug":"amendment-71-creates-odd-bedfellows","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/amendment-71-creates-odd-bedfellows\/","title":{"rendered":"Amendment 71 creates odd bedfellows"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

\"Recently,
Recently, an out of state special-interest group delivered a fabricated Trojan horse to Colorado to oppose Amendment 71. Supporters of Amendment 71, known as Raise the Bar, say it is necessary to curtail the out-of-state special interests trying to amend Colorado\u2019s constitution. Ironically, the Virginia-sponsored horse is being used by opponents as a metaphor for Amendment 71, according to a release from Raise the Bar.<\/span>Courtesy of Greg Brophy<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/p>

DENVER \u2013 Forget \u201cThe Odd Couple,\u201d opponents of Amendment 71 in Colorado could have their own sitcom, \u201cOdd Bedfellows.\u201d<\/p>\n

The coalition opposed to making it more difficult to amend the state constitution represents the most diverse group of Colorado interests and individuals in recent memory.<\/p>\n

There\u2019s former U.S. Rep. Tom Tancredo, one of the nation\u2019s most outspoken critics of illegal immigration, joining with Padres & J\u00f3venes Unidos<\/a> and other Latino advocacy groups.<\/p>\n

NARAL Pro-Choice Colorado<\/a> is on board with Colorado Right To Life<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Colorado Fiscal Institute<\/a> and the Bell Policy Center<\/a>, two left-leaning think tanks, are fighting Amendment 71 with the fiscally conservative libertarian Independence Institute<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Normally on opposite sides of the political spectrum, these groups and others have one thing in common this election \u2013 to convince voters that Amendment 71<\/a> would quell democracy.<\/p>\n

\u201cIn my nearly three decades in Colorado politics I have never seen, I mean NEVER, seen such a diverse coalition of organizations that are usually at war with one another come together like this,\u201d said Jon Caldara<\/a>, president of the Independence Institute. \u201cWhat binds this coalition is a fear of unchecked power by the political establishment.\u201d<\/p>\n

Proponents, however, say the opposition is making the case for them.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe groups opposing Amendment 71 are literally the one and same groups that use the amendment process for their own narrow special-interest purposes,\u201d said Katelyn Roberts, a consultant for the Raise the Bar<\/a> campaign.<\/p>\n

It is true that many of the groups in the opposition coalition have used the constitutional initiative process to push agenda items and issues. But they say that is grass-roots democracy in action.<\/p>\n

This year, environmental groups weren\u2019t quite so successful. An effort to ask voters to allow local governments to ban and limit hydraulic fracturing failed, as proponents weren\u2019t able to collect the required amount of valid signatures.<\/p>\n

Greenpeace<\/a>, an international environmental group that assisted with the fracking initiatives in Colorado, is one of the groups opposing Amendment 71.<\/p>\n

The organization, which in America is based in Washington, D.C., flew a \u201cthermal airship\u201d blimp<\/a> over Denver and Boulder urging, \u201cVote no 71 \u2026 Don\u2019t let BIG $$$ rig our democracy.\u201d It cost $20,000, according to filings.<\/p>\n

Those opposed to Amendment 71 argue that only wealthy special interests would make the ballot under the initiative, as they would have the money to pay signature collectors.<\/p>\n

Amendment 71 would require signatures from all 35 state Senate districts for a question that would amend the state constitution to make the ballot. Of the total required signatures \u2013 currently 98,492 \u2013 the number collected from each district would need to equal at least 2 percent of the registered voters in those districts.<\/p>\n

Issues would then need 55 percent of the vote to pass.<\/p>\n

Raise the Bar has seen significant funding from one of the nation\u2019s wealthiest industries, oil and gas.<\/p>\n

Of the nearly $4.2 million that proponents have raised, Protecting Colorado\u2019s Environment, Economy and Energy Independence<\/a>, an advocacy group for the oil and gas industry, has contributed nearly $2.6 million to campaign efforts, according to filings.<\/p>\n

The opposition coalition also is assisted by out-of-state special interests.<\/p>\n

A campaign effort by opponents included a 10-foot-tall \u201cTrojan horse\u201d wooden statue, which the coalition paraded around Colorado in an effort to convince voters that Amendment 71 is nothing more than an attempt to secretly undermine the democratic process.<\/p>\n

The $10,000 for use of the statue came from Virginia-based Citizens in Charge<\/a>, a group dedicated to \u201cprotecting and expanding the initiative and referendum process.\u201d Opponents listed in its explanation for the contribution that Citizens in Charge paid Liberty Petition Projects for use of the \u201cTrojan horse float.\u201d<\/p>\n

Issue committees formed to fight Amendment 71 have raised about $645,000 in total monetary and nonmonetary contributions, according to filings. Major contributions have come from unions, such as the National Education Association<\/a> and Colorado AFL-CIO<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe no on 71 campaign is funded almost entirely by out-of-state, big box special interest groups,\u201d Roberts said. \u201cEven their ridiculous Trojan horse was paid for by an inside-the-Beltway special-interest group.\u201d<\/p>\n

But Tim Hoover, spokesman for Colorado Fiscal Institute, said it\u2019s an unfair comparison.<\/p>\n

\u201cIf this were a \u2018Star Wars\u2019 movie, we wouldn\u2019t even be the rebels, we are the Ewoks. We\u2019re fighting with rocks and bamboo sticks and some vine. It\u2019s nowhere equal,\u201d Hoover said.<\/p>\n

Both sides have been boosted by big names.<\/p>\n

On Monday, actor Mark Ruffalo<\/a> \u2013 who played the Marvel Comics character the Hulk in \u201cThe Avengers\u201d movies \u2013 posted a tweet opposing the initiative that read, \u201cDon\u2019t let wealthy special interests rig our democracy and silence your voice. Vote #NoOn71.\u201d<\/p>\n

It was part of a Thunderclap<\/a> effort, which uses crowd social media messaging to pump out a message at a selected time in an attempt to reach masses quickly. Thunderclap said the coordinated effort reached more than 2.9 million people.<\/p>\n

Another superhero to many Coloradans, former Denver Broncos quarterback and current team executive John Elway<\/a> asked to be part of a pair of television ads<\/a> supporting the initiative, in which he says, \u201cI love this state, and I\u2019m worried about the games being played with our constitution.\u201d<\/p>\n

Amendment 71 also has the support of every living Colorado governor, and proponents have built a bipartisan coalition, which includes some odd bedfellows of its own, such as Republican and Democratic politicians who have clashed in the past.<\/p>\n

The elected officials who have come together in support of the initiative argue that conflicting constitutional amendments \u2013 such as the Taxpayer\u2019s Bill of Rights, which curbs government spending, and other constitutional requirements to spend on education \u2013 make it difficult for government to operate.<\/p>\n

They point out that existing provisions in the constitution could be repealed by the same simple majority under the Raise the Bar proposal.<\/p>\n

The ballot question also would not alter the statutory proposition process. Statutory ballot questions are easier to amend because language is not locked into the constitution.<\/p>\n

\u201cAll the other side does is offer misinformation,\u201d said former state Sen. Greg Brophy, R-Wray, a lead proponent. \u201cIf representative government doesn\u2019t work, you still have the initiative process to do an end run around the Legislature.\u201d<\/p>\n

pmarcus@durangoherald.com<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

toughen constitutional amendment process creates strange coalitions<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":70346,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[791,1615,266,13],"naviga_topic":[],"class_list":["post-70345","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","tag-ballot-initiatives","tag-constitution","tag-election","tag-frontpage-lead"],"acf":[],"author_name":"dh_admin","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70345","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70345"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70345\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/70346"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70345"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70345"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70345"},{"taxonomy":"naviga_topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/naviga_topic?post=70345"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}