<\/p>\n
The Colorado Supreme Court heard oral arguments Thursday in Kinder Morgan\u2019s tax case against Montezuma County.<\/p>\n
The 9-year battle stems from a 2008 dispute over the company\u2019s reported assessed values of carbon dioxide production, and whether Kinder Morgan is a related party of the Cortez Pipeline, which would disqualify a tariff deduction.<\/p>\n
Millions of dollars in county tax revenues hang in the balance in the landmark case. The court has not said when it would make a ruling.<\/p>\n
Lawyers from both sides were given a half-hour to make their case to the court. The oral arguments were live streamed on the Colorado Supreme Court\u2019s website.<\/p>\n
Kinder Morgan was represented by lawyer Alan Poe. Montezuma County was represented by attorney Nathan Keever of the firm Dufford, Waldeck, Milburn and Crohn, and lawyers with the Colorado Attorney General\u2019s Office. As of last year, the county had spent $138,000 on the case.<\/p>\n
Judges posed technical legal questions to both sides during their arguments, and asked more questions to the lawyers representing Montezuma County.<\/p>\n
Much of the back and forth centered on whether Kinder Morgan is a legal \u201crelated party\u201d to the Cortez Pipeline, what property is allowed to be retroactively assessed, and the legal distinctions between underreported property values and omitted property values.<\/p>\n
A long and winding history<\/p>\n
In 2008, then-county assessor Mark Vanderpool denied Kinder Morgan a transportation tariff deduction, which boosted the company\u2019s overall assessed valuation on carbon dioxide production by $56.7 million.<\/p>\n
As a result, the company owed an additional $2 million in property taxes for its 2008 tax bill.<\/p>\n
They paid in protest, then challenged the calculation in the courts.<\/p>\n
The Montezuma County Board of Assessment Appeals upheld the assessed valuation, and the Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed the county\u2019s calculation. Kinder Morgan then appealed the case to the state Supreme Court.<\/p>\n
In its time to speak, Kinder Morgan argued the county assessor did not appropriately apply state statute to the company\u2019s assessed valuation.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe statute does not authorize retroactive assessment,\u201d Poe said.<\/p>\n
Justice Richard L. Gabriel interjected and asked Poe whether Kinder Morgan was fighting their assessed valuation because \u201cequities were not going your client\u2019s way\u201d and they want to \u201cget a $2 million tax benefit.\u201d<\/p>\n
Proving that you\u2019re not a related party \u201cis an uphill battle,\u201d Gabriel said.<\/p>\n
Poe responded that Kinder Morgan is in a \u201cpartnership\u201d with the Cortez Pipeline, and falls into the \u201cunrelated party\u201d category allowing for the disputed tariff deduction.<\/p>\n
He said the retroactive assessment was inappropriate because the courts \u201cmade clear that undervaluation is not omitted property.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cIf there\u2019s an inequity here, under the court of appeals decision, oil and gas is the only one they can go back (and retroactively assess), which creates problems for the oil and gas taxpayers,\u201d Poe said. \u201cThe assessor takes a separate interpretation on related party. Partnership is not sufficient to disqualify the operator,\u201d from the tariff deduction.<\/p>\n
In its half-hour, Montezuma County asserted that Kinder Morgan is a majority owner in the Cortez Pipeline, and therefore does not qualify for the tariff deduction.<\/p>\n
Representing Montezuma County, Nathan Keever argued that statutes allow the county to audit Kinder Morgan on past tax filings to discover if property was omitted. Under the law, they can then retroactively assess taxes based on new values.<\/p>\n
Keever said auditors hired by the county discovered the company took the tariff deduction, and the county denied it, saying they did not qualify.<\/p>\n
\u201cThey can still take a deduction, but it must be the appropriate deduction,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
Keever said that Cortez Pipeline is a service provider for Kinder Morgan, and that it would be unfair for Kinder Morgan to get the tariff deduction because they are a majority pipeline owner.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe reason it is unfair is the company was paying the service provider 22 cents, but getting 11 cents back,\u201d Keever said.<\/p>\n
He said the purpose of the tax system is to allow the county to impose taxes on real property equally.<\/p>\n
\u201cKinder Morgan is seeking a windfall to the detriment of Montezuma County taxpayers,\u201d Keever said. \u201cTo get the result, it is asking the court to disrupt a functioning tax system that covers the unique oil and gas property interest. The assessment is clear and sensible and should not be disturbed the this court.\u201d<\/p>\n
After one hour, the justices said they would take the matter under advisement.<\/p>\n
\u201cA lot of money is hanging on this case,\u201d said Montezuma County Assessor Scott Davis. \u201cIf we lose, taxing entities will have to pay back what was collected from that year with interest.\u201d<\/p>\n
If the county prevails, Davis said, Kinder Morgan could owe back taxes to the county that could be in the millions of dollars.<\/p>\n
That\u2019s because since 2009 Kinder Morgan has continued to claim the disputed transportation tariff deduction while the matter goes through the courts, Davis said.<\/p>\n
Kinder Morgan, the nation\u2019s fourth-largest energy company, argues that the retroactive valuation is not authorized by state statute, according to court documents.<\/p>\n
If the Supreme Court upholds the denied deduction, audits on the company\u2019s production values for past years will strike the tariff deduction.<\/p>\n
The resulting higher assessed values could mean additional taxes will be owed.<\/p>\n
In 2008, county taxing districts reaped the windfall of the additional Kinder Morgan tax revenues. But the districts were instructed to hold on to the money pending the outcome of the case, because they may have to pay it back if the county lost the case.<\/p>\n
The largest beneficiary of the increased tax collection was the Re-1 School District, which reaped $942,000 in 2008.<\/p>\n
Other significant amounts went to the county general fund ($513,000), the road and bridge fund ($129,000), the Montezuma County Sheriff\u2019s Office ($71,000), social services ($64,000), and Southwest Memorial Hospital ($50,000). The rest was spread out among smaller districts including local fire departments and cemetery districts.<\/p>\n
Kinder Morgan extracts and processes carbon dioxide from Montezuma County and transports it through the Cortez Pipeline to the Permian Basin in West Texas, where it is used in enhanced oil recovery.<\/p>\n
To view an archived video of the Supreme Court oral arguments go to https:\/\/www.courts.state.co.us\/Courts\/Supreme_Court\/ and click on the archive tab.<\/p>\n