The brainchild of Durango water engineer Steve Harris, Senate Bill 17 originally would have limited the size of lawns in new suburban developments. That idea proved highly controversial among home builders and local governments, so the sponsor, Sen. Ellen Roberts, R-Durango, rewrote it to remove the lawn mandate and instead call for a study of water conservation by the Legislature\u2019s summer water committee.<\/p>\n
Even so, the plan narrowly survived the House Agriculture Committee on Monday, passing on a 6-5 vote. Four Republicans and a suburban Democrat, Rep. Steve Lebsock of Thornton, voted against it.<\/p>\n
One of the sponsors, Rep. Don Coram, R-Montrose, said he wants to make sure farmers don\u2019t run out of water as cities grow.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe need to make sure we keep the farmer at the end of the ditch whole,\u201d Coram said.<\/p>\n
Lobby groups for cities and home builders fought against the original bill, but now support they support it. Kevin Bommer of the Colorado Municipal League took the opportunity to defend cities.<\/p>\n
\u201cThere is a big misperception that municipalities aren\u2019t doing anything, or perhaps aren\u2019t doing enough, on municipal water conservation,\u201d Bommer said. \u201cI think that could not be further from the truth.\u201d<\/p>\n
The bill has touched a nerve among Colorado\u2019s water experts, and municipal water conservation is likely to be a hot discussion topic as the state prepares to write its first-ever water plan. Gov. John Hickenlooper has called for the Colorado Water Plan to be drafted by December.<\/p>\n
The original idea to target lawns for newly built homes would not have helped, because new homes tend to have small lawns, said Jeani Frickey of the Colorado Association of Home Builders.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt\u2019s not necessarily new construction where you are going to see those huge water savings. It\u2019s existing housing stock,\u201d Frickey said.<\/p>\n
The bill now goes to the full House.<\/p>\n