{"id":58027,"date":"2013-08-05T23:31:50","date_gmt":"2013-08-06T05:31:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/furse-wont-prosecute-harpers-cases\/"},"modified":"2026-03-29T16:06:31","modified_gmt":"2026-03-29T16:06:31","slug":"furse-wont-prosecute-harpers-cases","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/furse-wont-prosecute-harpers-cases\/","title":{"rendered":"Furse won\u2019t prosecute Harper\u2019s cases"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Local and state authorities were informed last week that a Montezuma County Sheriff\u2019s Office deputy with a checkered past would no longer be utilized to prosecute criminals.<\/p>\n<p>In an eight-paragraph letter dated Monday, July 29, District Attorney Will Furse told law enforcement officials that Deputy Darrin Harper had demonstrated a pattern and practice of disregard for the personal liberties and constitutional rights of local citizens. He also wrote that his office \u201ccan no longer prosecute cases attributed to Deputy Darrin Harper\u201d due to the officer\u2019s \u201cunlawful actions.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The July 29 written notification was addressed to Sheriff Dennis Spruell, and included copies to the Montezuma County Board of Commissioners, Cortez Police Department, Mancos Marshal\u2019s Office and the Colorado State Patrol. An anonymous source forwarded a copy of the correspondence to the Cortez Journal.<\/p>\n<p>Furse said his office is currently investigating Harper\u2019s alleged misconduct, but he declined to reveal when the probe was launched.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDeputy Harper\u2019s conduct has been brought to the sheriff\u2019s attention on numerous occasions where after no notable action or consequence followed,\u201d Furse said. \u201cWith frequency, Harper\u2019s credibility as a witness has been questioned based on accusations of falsified records, inaccurate reports and conflicting testimony.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In the 635-word letter, Furse said Harper\u2019s \u201cunconstitutional acts\u201d had forced the dismissal of serious criminal charges against numerous defendants. According to district attorney records, Harper \u2014 who is no longer employed by the MCSO \u2014 remains as a listed witness in 22 pending criminal cases.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMy office offered to train Deputy Harper and others on legal precedence and constitutional authority related to common situations such as traffic stops, witness questioning, Miranda advisements, home and vehicle searches and entry onto someone\u2019s property,\u201d Furse explained.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThat\u2019s simply untrue,\u201d Spruell responded during a 40-minute interview with the Cortez Journal. \u201cNever have I been talked to about the district attorney\u2019s office offering their assistance, ever,\u201d he emphatically denied.<\/p>\n<p>According to the letter, the training offered by the district attorney was met with both \u201creluctance and apathy\u201d from the sheriff\u2019s office. The letter further stated that the district attorney also offered constructive criticism as to \u201cspecific, prohibited performances\u201d of Deputy Harper.<\/p>\n<p>In response to the letter, Spruell described it as \u201cbizarre\u201d and \u201cunprofessional\u201d for Furse to send the letter to outside agencies, and claimed portions of the letter were \u201cinaccurate,\u201d \u201cinflammatory,\u201d \u201cuntrue\u201d and \u201cloaded with improprieties.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think the letter was self-serving,\u201d the sheriff said last week. \u201cI don\u2019t know what\u2019s going on.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>However, during the media interview, Spruell repeatedly claimed that he initially requested a letter from the district attorney regarding Harper\u2019s conduct.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI\u2019m the one that asked for the letter,\u201d he said. \u201cThis has been an issue of mine.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Furse denied those claims, saying the sheriff never solicited a letter. The letter was sent, Furse said, because he has had a number of cases within the past two to three weeks that had to be dismissed due to Harper\u2019s actions.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIn one case, [Harper] kicked in a door without a warrant,\u201d Furse explained. \u201cHis actions have been unconstitutional and unlawful.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In addition to allegations of \u201congoing and historically ignored\u201d problems within the ranks of the Montezuma County Sheriff\u2019s Office, Furse also wrote commending and thanking Sheriff Spruell for his efforts, and cited that a vast majority of his deputies were \u201cvirtuous and constitutionally knowledgeable.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In response to the sheriff\u2019s reactions, Furse said he stands by his correspondence.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe letter is accurate, truthful and sincere,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>The entire text of the letter can be viewed online at www.cortezjournal.com.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"mailto:tbaker@cortezjournal.com\">tbaker@cortezjournal.com<\/a><\/p>\n<div class=\"naviga-scoreboard\">\n<h4 class=\"scoreboard-title\">The district attorney\u2019sletter to the sheriff<\/h4>\n<p>July 29, 2013<br>\n                Sheriff Spruell \u2013<br>\n                Since my administration\u2019s conception in January 2013, I have noted the vast majority of your Deputies to be virtuous and Constitutionally knowledgeable \u2013 \u2013 and as District Attorney, I hold many in your administration in high esteem.  Similarly, with great courage and public exposure, I have witnessed your strong stance on the preservation of our 2nd Amendment and watched as you accurately preached the perils of federal overreach. Regarding these positions, I personally commend the efforts you\u2019ve demonstrated and thank you for them.<br>\n                As Sheriff, you have noted the sincerity with which I have expressed my devotion and allegiance to the Constitution.  With this commitment at the forefront, I must be direct and describe that my reverence and accolade is not extended to all under your employ.  Corresponding with unique exigency, I am obliged to respectfully address what has been an ongoing and historically ignored problem within the ranks of the Montezuma County Sheriff\u2019s Office.<br>\n                A great deal of communication between our agencies reflects the candidness with which I brought intermittent, unconstitutional actions of particular Deputies to your attention.  My administration has spent time and resources attempting to highlight and correct these actions in light of our duty to seek justice and support the Constitution.  However, our records show that Deputy Harper has frequently been the subject of this correspondence as it relates to his conduct.<br>\n                For the last eight months, my administration has offered constructive criticism as to specific, prohibited performances of Deputy Harper.  We have articulated the precise imperfections of his actions and requested modifications of his methods.  My office has engaged in this way because Deputy Harper\u2019s deeds have had grave consequences to our criminal cases.  Detrimentally affecting community safety and undermining the Constitution, Deputy Harper\u2019s acts have forced the dismissal of serious criminal charges against numerous defendants.  Two recent examples of Deputy Harper\u2019s unlawful conduct can be noted in matters involving Desirae Benally; two cases ultimately dismissed based on findings of unconstitutional acts.<br>\n                In response to this continuing predicament, my office has offered trainings to Deputy Harper and other members of your patrol staff with the hope that future cases could be saved from a similar fate.  As prosecutors, we truly hoped Deputy Harper was amenable to change notwithstanding his history of demotion and reprimand noted in his Arizona and Colorado personnel files.  These good faith offerings of education however have been met with reluctance and apathy.  I must admit that I find it surprising to know Deputy Harper has been promoted since January 2013, despite the many sordid actions brought to your attention.<br>\n                Nevertheless, I acknowledge that I have neither the ability nor desire to impose change within the ranks of your administration.  I recognize that I cannot effectuate personnel or philosophical alteration within your office.  I similarly identify the incapacity with which I have previously convinced you to make changes regarding Deputy Harper and I arrive at the following course of action only out of necessity.<br>\n                The 22 Judicial District Attorney\u2019s office is hereby putting relevant parties on notice that it can no longer prosecute cases attributed to Deputy Darrin Harper.  My administration can no longer endure the perhaps well intentioned, but nevertheless unlawful actions of Deputy Harper.  Deputies within my administration will be instructed to evaluate current caseloads with specific attention paid to those cases containing Deputy Harper\u2019s statements, investigations, and attestations.  To the extent these cases can be prosecuted without Deputy Harper\u2019s future involvement, we will do all in our power to preserve them; but be aware that my office will not invite Deputy Harper to the stand to do so.<br>\n                Your comments and questions are welcome, but will not affect the finality of this difficult decision.  I again extol the countless ways your administration continues to protect and serve Montezuma and thank you personally and professionally.<br>\n                Respectfully,<br>\n                William Furse, Esq.<br>\n                District Attorney<br>\n                Cc: Montezuma County Board of Commissioners; Cortez Police Department; Mancos Marshall\u2019s Office; Colorado State Patrol<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sheriff saysDA neveroffered aid<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[13,52,237],"naviga_topic":[],"class_list":["post-58027","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-frontpage-lead","tag-law-enforcement","tag-montezuma-county-government"],"acf":[],"author_name":"dh_admin","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58027","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=58027"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58027\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":62918,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58027\/revisions\/62918"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=58027"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=58027"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=58027"},{"taxonomy":"naviga_topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/naviga_topic?post=58027"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}