{"id":50910,"date":"2020-10-18T20:09:52","date_gmt":"2020-10-19T02:09:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/gardner-hickenlooper-remove-gloves-in-final-debate\/"},"modified":"2020-10-19T02:09:52","modified_gmt":"2020-10-19T02:09:52","slug":"gardner-hickenlooper-remove-gloves-in-final-debate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/gardner-hickenlooper-remove-gloves-in-final-debate\/","title":{"rendered":"Gardner, Hickenlooper remove gloves in final debate"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

\"U.S.
U.S. Senate candidates John Hickenlooper and Cory Gardner squared off Tuesday in what is expected to be their final debate before the Nov. 3 election.<\/span>Courtesy of Gage Skidmore via Creative Commons<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/p>

U.S. Sen. Cory Gardner and former Gov. John Hickenlooper swung at each other over a number of issues this week during the final debate of their Senate race.<\/p>\n

The candidates slung frequent barbs back and forth as they rehashed arguments that have become campaign mainstays and touched on new topics as they made their case for Coloradans\u2019 support.<\/p>\n

Gardner, the Republican incumbent, continued his campaign-long questioning of Hickenlooper\u2019s ethics and accused the Democratic candidate of being in politics for himself. Hickenlooper looked to cast Gardner as a Washington insider and himself as a potential solution to the political logjam in the nation\u2019s capital.<\/p>\n

The debate took place Tuesday in Fort Collins, hosted by Colorado State University, The Coloradoan<\/em> and 9News. Moderators pressed the candidates on numerous issues, some new to the debate stage.<\/p>\n

Throughout the hourlong debate, Gardner and Hickenlooper used the questions posed as frequent jumping-off points for attacks on their adversary\u2019s record.<\/p>\n

Relief talks lead to early attacks<\/div>\n

Moderators began by asking about the COVID-19 pandemic. A relief package has been a hot-button issue on the campaign trail as it has been over six months since Congress last passed a relief bill.<\/p>\n

The candidates have agreed that the passage of another relief package should be a priority in Congress. That didn\u2019t stop them for using relief and health care as a jumping-off point for several disagreements.<\/p>\n

Gardner was asked what was needed to improve pandemic response. He said the Senate must pass a relief package. He then described what he hoped to see in a relief bill \u2013support for small businesses, medical supplies and more, and turned to attack Hickenlooper for not supporting the bill pitched by Senate Republicans in September.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe can\u2019t afford to have somebody who refuses to support the people of Colorado in the Senate,\u201d Gardner said.<\/p>\n

Hickenlooper responded by pointing to a previous debate in which Gardner and Hickenlooper agreed a relief package should take priority in Congress over seeking to confirm a U.S. Supreme Court justice.<\/p>\n

\u201cCory could just say, \u2018I will not vote to support this \u2026 Supreme Court nominee if indeed the relief act doesn\u2019t get passed first,\u201d Hickenlooper said. \u201cHis priority would be a strong point toward getting relief.\u201d<\/p>\n

Gardner said Hickenlooper failed to build a stockpile of personal protective equipment that could have assisted in the pandemic response.<\/p>\n

Hickenlooper called the assertion \u201cridiculous\u201d and hailed Gov. Jared Polis\u2019 efforts in mitigating the pandemic.<\/p>\n

Gardner called Hickenlooper\u2019s response a denial of responsibility, saying, \u201cWe don\u2019t need somebody in Washington, D.C., who thinks it\u2019s about himself, refuses to take responsibility and won\u2019t do the job for Colorado.\u201d<\/p>\n

Hickenlooper, however, said that sending him to Washington would help reignite aid negotiations and help break partisan disagreements.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhat\u2019s been, to me, most frustrating is we haven\u2019t seen any willingness on the Republican or the Democratic side to sit down and actually roll up their sleeves and find where do we agree, where do we disagree \u2026\u201d he said. \u201cThis has gone on long enough.\u201d<\/p>\n

Candidates pressed on previous issues<\/div>\n

The moderators of Tuesday\u2019s debate pressed Gardner and Hickenlooper on issues that have followed them on the campaign trail.<\/p>\n

Gardner was again questioned about his votes to repeal the Affordable Care Act. He spoke about his goals for a \u201cpatient-centered care system\u201d and went on to say that Hickenlooper was in favor of a government-run health care system that would eliminate insurance offered by employers.<\/p>\n

Hickenlooper responded by saying Senate Republicans had failed to give legislators the opportunity to improve the ACA. He has spoken frequently about his disdain for Republican-led efforts to repeal the ACA.<\/p>\n

Conversation then turned to a health care bill that Gardner introduced this year. The bill was introduced with the stated goal of guaranteeing coverage for people with preexisting conditions regardless of what happened to the ACA; Gardner was questioned as to whether the bill would also make it so that insurance companies can\u2019t refuse to offer coverage in the first place to people with pre-existing conditions.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe bill itself requires coverage for people with preexisting conditions,\u201d Gardner said.<\/p>\n

When pressed on provisions that would guarantee availability of coverage for preexisting conditions, Gardner repeated himself. He said his bill would make it so that everyone with preexisting conditions can get coverage.<\/p>\n

Hickenlooper has attacked Gardner\u2019s bill several times, pointing to several fact checks that have suggested language in the bill does not require that insurance companies require coverage of preexisting conditions.<\/p>\n

And Hickenlooper found himself faced with questions about ethics violations from his time as governor that have dogged his campaign. He was fined earlier this year for violating the state\u2019s rules on receiving gifts while in office.<\/p>\n

Hickenlooper has downplayed the violations during his campaign. On Tuesday, he called them \u201cinadvertent\u201d but said they were brought to light by a Republican organization looking for attack-ad material.<\/p>\n

\u201cI paid the $2,800 fine. I take responsibility for that,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

Gardner has made the ethics violations a focus in his campaigning against Hicknelooper. He says they are evidence that Hickenlooper is in politics for his own gain.<\/p>\n

Split on yes or no questions<\/div>\n

At a few points throughout the debate, Hickenlooper and Gardner were presented with questions and asked to answer \u201cyes\u201d or \u201cno\u201d unless they did not have an answer to give. Some of the questions were about the ballot measures being put before Coloradans this election. Others dealt more broadly with issues on the campaign trail, in Colorado and in Washington, D.C.<\/p>\n

They gave their opinions on supporting Proposition 115, which would outlaw third-trimester abortions. Gardner said he supports it; Hickenlooper does not. They were asked about the repeal of the Gallagher Amendment; Hickenlooper supports the repeal and Gardner does not. Moderators asked candidates about Proposition 118, which would enact paid family and medical leave. Hickenlooper supports it; Gardner said he was unsure because he had not looked into the potential impact on businesses. They were asked about the proposal for Colorado to join the National Popular Vote Compact. Hickenlooper is in favor, Gardner is not.<\/p>\n

Between the policy questions were the two yes-no questions that left people talking throughout Colorado media. First, candidates were asked simply whether they considered their opponent to be \u201ca moral and ethical man.\u201d<\/p>\n

Gardner began by saying that he had \u201cgrave concerns\u201d about Hickenlooper\u2019s ethics violations and appeared to want to continue before being stopped by the moderator after not giving a yes or no answer. Hickenlooper, when asked the question about Gardner, paused, then said \u201cyes.\u201d<\/p>\n

The candidates were then asked the same question about President Donald Trump. Hickenlooper said no. Gardner said yes, but added that he wished Trump \u201cwould be more specific in his communications with the American people.\u201d<\/p>\n

Trump lost in Colorado by about 5% in 2016, and polls show him trailing Joe Biden this year. Gardner has been needled throughout the campaign for his connections with Trump, although Tuesday\u2019s debate gave him a chance to highlight times he\u2019s broken with Trump and the Republican Party.<\/p>\n

Gardner said he has opposed the Republican Party on issues like the legalization of marijuana and immigration policy.<\/p>\n

Gardner also encouraged Trump to be \u201ccrystal clear\u201d about a peaceful transfer of power. He called the peaceful transition of power a \u201challmark\u201d of American democracy. Gardner has endorsed Trump for the presidency but also has worked to change the president\u2019s mind on issues like funding for the Land and Water Conservation Fund.<\/p>\n

Election day is not until Nov. 3; however, in Colorado mail-in voting is well underway. Tuesday\u2019s debate was presumably the last for Gardner and Hickenlooper to face off directly.<\/p>\n

John Purcell is an intern for The Durango Herald and The Journal in Cortez and a student at American University in Washington, D.C.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

U.S. Senate candidates go on offensive as Coloradans begin to vote<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":50911,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[481,28,29,24,1566],"naviga_topic":[],"class_list":["post-50910","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","tag-gov-john-hickenlooper","tag-headlines","tag-newsletter","tag-u-s-sen-cory-gardner","tag-u-s-senate"],"acf":[],"author_name":"dh_admin","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50910","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=50910"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50910\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/50911"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=50910"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=50910"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=50910"},{"taxonomy":"naviga_topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/naviga_topic?post=50910"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}