{"id":39412,"date":"2022-07-18T12:31:02","date_gmt":"2022-07-18T18:31:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/conservation-groups-offer-alternate-plan-for-colorado-wolf-reintroduction\/"},"modified":"2026-03-31T08:49:44","modified_gmt":"2026-03-31T08:49:44","slug":"conservation-groups-offer-alternate-plan-for-colorado-wolf-reintroduction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/conservation-groups-offer-alternate-plan-for-colorado-wolf-reintroduction\/","title":{"rendered":"Conservation groups offer alternate plan for Colorado wolf reintroduction"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Kim
Kim Gittleson, center, witnesses the investigation by the Colorado Parks and Wildlife district managers into a heifer killed by wolves that had migrated from Wyoming. (Hugh Carey\/The Colorado Sun)<\/span>cca<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/p>\n

A group of wildlife advocates is blasting Colorado Parks and Wildlife\u2019s wolf reintroduction process, saying the intent of the voter-approved proposition has been \u201clost or undermined.\u201d<\/p>\n

Since voters in November 2020 approved Proposition 114 directing the state to craft a plan and reintroduce wolves on the Western Slope by the end of 2023, CPW has hosted a series of statewide meetings and organized two groups to create a management plan.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe feel that formal processes since the passage of Proposition 114 have minimized meaningful public input and uplifted the voices of ranchers, outfitters, trappers, and hunters over others en route to a plan that is likely to limit the possibilities of wolves on the Colorado landscape,\u201d reads a letter submitted to the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission on Monday by 14 wildlife advocacy groups, including the Center for Biological Diversity, WildEarth Guardians, the Colorado Sierra Club and the Humane Society of the U.S.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe in the conservation community have felt cut out of the process,\u201d said Lindsay Larris with conservation group WildEarth Guardians.<\/p>\n

The wildlife group says CPW\u2019s two groups that are crafting a reintroduction plan \u2013 a 17-member Technical Working Group made of wildlife management professionals that meets privately, and a 19-member Stakeholder Advisory Group, or SAG, that meets publicly \u2013 have \u201ctilted what should be an aspirational conversation toward a cynical one that has focused on livestock owner compensation, artificially limiting populations and when, where and how to kill wolves.\u201d<\/p>\n

The wildlife advocates\u2019 26-page plan \u201caccentuates certain issues that we feel have been missing or minimized in formal processes to date.\u201d The group plans to present their plan to wildlife commissioners later this week at the board\u2019s meeting in Edwards.<\/p>\n

\"Wildlife
Wildlife advocates suggest that after three phases of introduction and management, Colorado could host 150 packs or about 750 wolves, with a population ranging from 600 to 1,500. (Dawn Villell\/The Associated Press file)<\/span>onset<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/p>

\u201cIt was concerning that at the last SAG meeting, there was discussion about how to allow wolf hunting,\u201d Larris said. \u201cWe want to voice our concerns now before any draft plan comes out so we can hopefully see some of our ideas in the plan and not have to wait to only provide comments on the plan.\u201d<\/p>\n

Colorado Parks and Wildlife has said that once wolves are established in the state, \u201cpopulation management options, including hunting, will be evaluated.\u201d Hunting of wolves is allowed in Idaho, Montana and Wyoming.<\/p>\n

The group proposal divides Colorado into 12 zones with suitable wolf habitat, using a model built in 2015 by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife to develop a map of potential wolf range.<\/p>\n

The group proposes releasing a breeding pair of wolves into each of the zones, with a first-phase plan of having 48 to 120 wolves roaming the state in the first two years of reintroduction.<\/p>\n

The 12 interconnected zones are:<\/p>\n

Rocky Mountain National Park.Dinosaur National Monument.Flat Tops Wilderness.BLM land north of Grand Junction and south of Dinosaur.Holy Cross and Hunter-Frying Pan Wilderness.Maroon Bells-Snowmass Wilderness.West Grand Mesa-Uncompahgre-Gunnison National Forest.West Elk Wilderness.Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area.La Garita Wilderness.Hermosa Creek Wilderness.Weminuche Wilderness.<\/div>\n

The group suggests that after three phases of introduction and management, Colorado could host 150 packs or about 750 wolves, with a population ranging from 600 to 1,500.<\/p>\n

\u201cThat shall be the ongoing goal for the minimum presence of wolves in Colorado,\u201d reads the group\u2019s report.<\/p>\n

That population estimate is based on the density of deer and elk, which could support 4,138 wolves, the report concludes. (The report\u2019s formula estimates 294,000 deer and elk in Colorado at 500 pounds each and does appear to include the impact of other predators, like mountain lions.) Land ownership and road density also factor into the population numbers, as does the abundance of wilderness areas.<\/p>\n

The group also identified suitable wolf habitat east of the Continental Divide and urged the commission to allow wolves to roam into the Front Range, noting that \u201cProposition 114 does not explicitly impose any limits on where wolves may be allowed to live in Colorado after they are reintroduced.\u201d The proposal also suggests Mexican wolves should be introduced in southern Colorado.<\/p>\n

For management, the wildlife group proposes reclassifying wolves as a Tier 1 Species of Greatest Conservation Need in Colorado\u2019s State Wildlife Action Plan. The predators are listed as endangered in Colorado, but are classified as Tier 2 on the conservation priority list.<\/p>\n

The group says killing wolves should not be permitted \u201cexcept in extremely limited circumstances,\u201d pointing to a 2020 study that concluded \u201clegal killing of wolves begets illegal killing of wolves.\u201d<\/p>\n

The group outlines rules for killing wolves in the three phases of wolf reintroduction. In all phases, wolves can be killed in defense of human life. In the first phase of reintroduction, ranchers cannot kill wolves that are preying on livestock. In the second phase, Colorado Parks and Wildlife officers on private land can kill a wolf if ranchers have lost four or more animals in seven days. In the third phase, if a rancher has lost five animals in three months, a CPW officer can kill a wolf on private land and a landowner can kill a wolf that is caught biting, wounding or killing livestock or working dogs.<\/p>\n

\u201cKilling wolves in response to livestock conflict has the highest variability of success when compared to nonlethal practices like fencing, deterrents, and shepherds,\u201d reads the group\u2019s report.<\/p>\n\n

The Colorado Sun is a reader-supported, nonpartisan news organization dedicated to covering Colorado issues. To learn more, go to coloradosun.com.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Groups: Intent of voters \u2018undermined\u2019 by Parks and Wildlife; input from hunters and ranchers is uplifted<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":29966,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[233,28,29,603],"naviga_topic":[],"class_list":["post-39412","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","tag-coloradosun-com","tag-headlines","tag-newsletter","tag-wildlife"],"acf":[],"author_name":"dh_admin","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39412","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=39412"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39412\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":84325,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39412\/revisions\/84325"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/29966"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=39412"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=39412"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=39412"},{"taxonomy":"naviga_topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/naviga_topic?post=39412"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}