{"id":30041,"date":"2023-12-24T01:30:33","date_gmt":"2023-12-24T08:30:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/pair-of-wolves-released-in-colorado-part-of-oregon-pack-that-killed-livestock\/"},"modified":"2026-03-31T01:09:43","modified_gmt":"2026-03-31T07:09:43","slug":"pair-of-wolves-released-in-colorado-part-of-oregon-pack-that-killed-livestock","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/pair-of-wolves-released-in-colorado-part-of-oregon-pack-that-killed-livestock\/","title":{"rendered":"Pair of wolves released in Colorado part of Oregon pack that killed livestock"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"A
A gray wolf races out of a transport crateWolf 2303-OR, a juvenile male from the Five Points pack in Oregon weighing 76 pounds, races away from transport crates that carried him and four other wolves to Grand County. (Jerry Neal, Colorado Parks and Wildlife)<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/p>\n

A pair of wolves released this week in Colorado were part of the large Five Points pack in Oregon that killed three livestock animals. Oregon wildlife officials permitted federal officials to kill four wolves from the Five Points pack in July and August.<\/p>\n

\u201cOnce a pack has started depredating, then they would probably continue to include livestock in their diet in the future,\u201d said John Williams, the co-chair of the Oregon Cattlemen\u2019s Association Wolf Committee. \u201cThat does not mean they will always eat on livestock and it does not mean they will do it regularly. It means they know livestock is a viable and good source of food and when the situation arises, it would not surprise me to see them depredating.\u201d<\/p>\n

Colorado Parks and Wildlife on Dec. 18 released five wolves captured in Oregon in a remote corner of Grand County. The agency late Friday said wildlife biologists had released five more Oregon wolves \u2014 four yearling females and an adult male \u2014 in the last four days on state-owned land in Grand and Summit counties. The locations are being kept secret.<\/p>\n

Oregon\u2019s Five Points pack was 12 wolves at the end of 2022. Four animals from Five Points pack were killed \u2014 two adult females, one adult male and a yearling female \u2014 in response to what Oregon officials called \u201cchronic depredation of livestock.\u201d The history of the recently released wolves was first reported by The Fence Post.<\/p>\n

A pair of siblings \u2014 a male and female, both yearlings \u2014 from the Five Points pack were captured Dec. 17 in Oregon and released in Grand County the next day. The two wolves released this week were yearlings, meaning they were likely born in April 2022 and not adept hunters when the Five Points pack was killing livestock in northeast Oregon this summer.<\/p>\n

Travis Duncan with Colorado Parks and Wildlife said any wolves that have been near livestock will have some history of depredation \u201cand this includes all packs in Oregon.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThis does not mean they have a history of chronic depredation,\u201d Duncan said in an email. \u201cIf a pack has infrequent depredation events, they should not be excluded as a source population, per the (Colorado Wolf Restoration and Management) plan.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"121823
121823 \u2013 Colorado Parks and Wildlife officials released five gray wolves from Oregon onto public land in Grand County Monday.<\/span>cca<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/p>

In September, Colorado Parks and Wildlife wolf reintroduction manager Reid DeWalt told the Colorado House Agriculture Committee that the agency was asking other states for permission to capture and relocate wolves that \u201cdo not have a recent history of depredation.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cYou can see where folks would be like \u2018You can have these bad wolves,\u2019\u201d DeWalt told the committee Sept. 12.<\/p>\n

Committee chairman Sen. Dylan Roberts, a Democrat from Avon, asked DeWalt and Colorado Parks and Wildlife Director Jeff Davis if the agency would choose to not introduce wolves if the only available animals came from depredating packs.<\/p>\n

DeWalt said introducing wolves from depredating packs \u201cwould not be good for those animals.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cWe would be setting ourselves up for failure if we did that,\u201d DeWalt said.<\/p>\n

Davis told the committee that there were enough wolves in other states that did not have a history of killing livestock. The wildlife directors in other states \u201cunderstand the consequences\u201d of wolves that kill livestock, Davis said.<\/p>\n

\u201cI can honestly say none of us would give each other problem wolves,\u201d Davis said. \u201cThat would not set us up for success \u2026 and it feeds the story that wolves and ranchers cannot coexist.\u201d<\/p>\n

Oregon was the only state willing to provide wolves to Colorado\u2019s restoration effort.<\/p>\n

Ranchers in North Park are asking Colorado Parks and Wildlife to use lethal tactics to stop a pair of wolves that roamed down from Wyoming and are connected with killing or injuring 20 cows, lambs and working dogs since 2021. (On Friday, Colorado Parks and Wildlife officials sent a letter to rancher Don Gittleson denying his request that the agency kill the wolves, saying that attacks on livestock were declining this year since many from the original pack that wandered into northern Colorado had returned to Wyoming.)<\/p>\n

\u201cI think everyone would be very disappointed if it was problem wolves that were introduced before the end of the year,\u201d Sen. Jeff Bridges, a Democrat from Greenwood Village, said at the Sept. 12 committee hearing. \u201cI really think that it would be in everyone\u2019s best interest that the wolves that are introduced are not from problem packs.\u201d<\/p>\n

Michelle Dennehy, spokeswoman for the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, said Colorado Parks and Wildlife officials were given up-to-date information on packs in northeastern Oregon including all information depredation and lethal removal permits.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt was CPW\u2019s decision as to what packs to target, but ODFW provided all this info up front,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n

Duncan, a public information supervisor with Colorado Parks and Wildlife, said wildlife experts determining which wolves to relocate to Colorado weighed factors including the size of the pack, the removal of wolves from the pack and how the pack behaved after those lethal removals. The Five Points pack has not killed any livestock since four wolves were culled from the pack in late July and early August.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe change in pack behavior and the lack of current depredations met CPW criteria for accepting the animals,\u201d he said. \u201cCPW teams in Oregon passed on several larger and easier-to-access packs because they had recent depredation or had a chronic or ongoing depredation history.\u201d<\/p>\n

Oregon officials have killed at least 16 wolves connected to livestock depredation in 2023, compared with six wolves in 2022. Oregon counted 24 packs and 178 wolves at the beginning of the year.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe are in the thick of it right now and unfortunately that\u2019s what you are signing up for,\u201d said Williams with the Oregon Cattlemen\u2019s Association. \u201cWolves need two things: They need an adequate ungulate base for their food and they need tolerant people. Unfortunately in your state, much like our state, the tolerant people are in the cities and it\u2019s the ranchers and rural people who get the wolves.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read more at The Colorado Sun<\/div>\n

The Colorado Sun is a reader-supported, nonpartisan news organization dedicated to covering Colorado issues. To learn more, go to coloradosun.com.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Oregon pack\u2019s history does not exclude wolves from relocation <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":30042,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[28,29],"naviga_topic":[],"class_list":["post-30041","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","tag-headlines","tag-newsletter"],"acf":[],"author_name":"dh_admin","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30041","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=30041"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30041\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":80945,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30041\/revisions\/80945"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/30042"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30041"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=30041"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=30041"},{"taxonomy":"naviga_topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/naviga_topic?post=30041"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}