{"id":23422,"date":"2025-02-19T18:19:49","date_gmt":"2025-02-20T01:19:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/bill-that-would-ease-union-formation-earns-final-colorado-senate-approval\/"},"modified":"2025-02-20T01:19:49","modified_gmt":"2025-02-20T01:19:49","slug":"bill-that-would-ease-union-formation-earns-final-colorado-senate-approval","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/bill-that-would-ease-union-formation-earns-final-colorado-senate-approval\/","title":{"rendered":"Bill that would ease union formation earns final Colorado Senate approval"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

\"Assistant
Assistant Majority Leader Jennifer Bacon, a Denver Democrat, speaks about a labor rights bill at the Colorado Capitol on Nov. 19. (Sara Wilson\/Colorado Newsline file)<\/span>cca<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/p>

The Colorado Senate gave final approval to a bill Tuesday that would make it easier to form unions in Colorado, following hours of arguments in opposition from Republicans last week.<\/p>\n

Senate Bill 25-5 would eliminate a second election mandated by Colorado\u2019s Labor Peace Act to form a union, a requirement that is unique to Colorado. Federal law allows employees to unionize with a simple majority vote, but they must participate in a second vote with 75% approval to determine if workers who don\u2019t support the union have to pay representation fees.<\/p>\n

The Colorado Labor Peace Act passed in the 1940s, and bill sponsors referred to the provision requiring a second vote as \u201ca relic of the past.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cColorado has made significant progress since then, but returning to the policies of 1943 or allowing their legacy to persist would undermine decades of progress and hinder the state\u2019s future,\u201d Senate Majority Leader Robert Rodriguez, a Denver Democrat who sponsored the bill, said on the Senate floor last Thursday, when the chamber first took up the bill for debate.<\/p>\n

Senators voted 22-12 along party lines to approve the bill, with Republicans in opposition. Several Republican senators spoke against the bill again ahead of its final approval in the chamber Tuesday.<\/p>\n

Republicans argued the bill violates a worker\u2019s autonomy by making them pay union fees and dues even if they don\u2019t support or want to be part of the union. They also said it will make starting a business in Colorado less achievable. Several Republican senators offered amendments that all failed on the floor last week.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe relaxation of labor organizing standards will certainly deter the vitality of existing Colorado businesses, while also deterring future economic investment within the state,\u201d Sen. Barbara Kirkmeyer, a Brighton Republican, said Tuesday ahead of the Senate\u2019s final vote.<\/p>\n

Senate Minority Leader Paul Lundeen, a Monument Republican, said Thursday the second vote requirement puts Colorado in a \u201csweet spot\u201d between right to work states and union states. He described the bill as \u201ca wage theft bill.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cAt the end of the day, this bill seeks to get rid of an election that requires a 75% threshold to impose extraction of a portion of an individual\u2019s paycheck, who does not want to participate in the organization that would represent them,\u201d Lundeen said. \u201cBut they pay for it anyway.\u201d<\/p>\n

Sen. Jessie Danielson, a Jefferson County Democrat who also sponsored the bill, said the second vote \u201chas been referenced as this great, grand compromise\u201d but is working for employers and corporations, not workers.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe working people of the state of Colorado, as well as the folks all across this country, are demanding that we do better for them, do right for the workers,\u201d Danielson said. \u201cWe all know that when workers are protected by a union contract, it results in better pay, better benefits and safety on the job. We need to do what we can do to make joining a union easier when the barrier from a worker to this union protection is the heavy hand of the government standing in their way.\u201d<\/p>\n

Danielson added that a requirement for a second election leaves workers subject to extended \u201charassment and intimidation, retaliation, surveillance and possible firings\u201d from the employer. She said the second vote only exists to prevent workers from unionizing.<\/p>\n

The Senate Health Business, Labor and Technology Committee approved the bill along party lines in January.<\/p>\n

A November study from the Colorado Fiscal Institute found that of the 553 unions that initiated a second election between 1977 and 2024, 68% were successful. In 126 of the cases, the second election had a majority affirmative vote but fell short of the three-fourths requirement.<\/p>\n

The bill is staunchly opposed by business groups such as the Colorado Chamber of Commerce and Colorado Concern, which argue that the bill would erode Colorado\u2019s economic competitiveness and make it less attractive for businesses to remain in the state. Democratic Gov. Jared Polis has suggested that he will not support the legislation unless a compromise arises.<\/p>\n

The Colorado House of Representatives, which also has a strong Democratic majority, will need to approve the bill next.<\/p>\n

Five former U.S. Secretaries of Labor wrote to Polis in support of the bill last week, saying the requirement for a second vote creates unnecessary barriers to unionization.<\/p>\n

\u201cIn states without such restrictive laws, after a single successful election, details such as union dues and representation fees are then negotiated and approved in good faith by both workers and employers \u2013 a model of fairness that Colorado should embrace,\u201d the letter says.<\/p>\n

To read more stories from Colorado Newsline, visit www.coloradonewsline.com<\/em><\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Legislation, strongly opposed by business groups, moves to the House<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":23423,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[394,14,15,1606,1255,819,28,1922,1633],"naviga_topic":[],"class_list":["post-23422","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","tag-colorado-legislature","tag-colorado-state-house-of-representatives","tag-colorado-state-senate","tag-employer","tag-employment","tag-gov-jared-polis","tag-headlines","tag-labor","tag-unions"],"acf":[],"author_name":"dh_admin","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23422","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23422"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23422\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/23423"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23422"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23422"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23422"},{"taxonomy":"naviga_topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dh.durangoherald.com\/tj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/naviga_topic?post=23422"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}