\n <\/p>\n
SILVERTON<\/p>\n
Three million gallons of sludge rushed out of Gold King Mine last week, flooding the Animas River with higher levels of metals than usual, causing economic and environmental damage in three states. Yet in the wake of the disaster, many Silvertonians are redoubling their resistance to a Superfund listing the Environmental Protection Agency has long argued is necessary to deal with the town\u2019s network of draining mines.<\/p>\n
Resident John Ferguson harbors a deep mistrust of the EPA \u2013 the government department that is responsible for accidentally triggering the massive spill \u2013 and questions the agency\u2019s ability to fix leaky mines without causing greater harm.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe institutional arrogance of the EPA is so great; it\u2019s their way or the highway,\u201d Ferguson said Thursday, eight days after the mine spill. \u201cIt was appalling stupidity that this incident happened. \u2026 Who\u2019s going to protect us from the protectors?\u201d<\/p>\n
Tim Hewett said the \u201cpro-Superfund forces are very vocal right now,\u201d but the majority of the town\u2019s residents still oppose any such listing on the National Priorities List, fearing the designation will ruin the town\u2019s reputation, strangle credit and blight the local economy.<\/p>\n
\u201cI\u2019m afraid of the EPA. They\u2019re too powerful,\u201d Hewett said. \u201cThere\u2019s suspicion on my part that now the EPA is sitting judge and jury to decide the outcome of a fate that is a result of their negligence.\u201d<\/p>\n
But to the thousands of people living downstream of Silverton, the problem isn\u2019t so much the EPA as it is Silverton residents\u2019 decades-long refusal to accept that their mines require federal intervention.<\/p>\n
River advocate Dave Wuchert of Dolores said Silverton \u201chad to know those mines would fill up (with water). I don\u2019t blame the EPA.\u201d<\/p>\n
Wuchert said it is obvious that Gold King Mine\u2019s owner, San Juan Corp., and Kinross Gold, which owns the last company to do major mining in Silverton, Sunnyside Gold, are liable for the environmental disaster, and the public should hold them most accountable.<\/p>\n
Even before the Aug. 5 Gold King disaster, which polluted more than 100 miles of rivers in three states, U.S. Geological Survey scientists described the metals flowing out of Silverton\u2019s network of defunct mines into the Animas as the worst untreated mine damage in Colorado. The metal pollution in Cement Creek is so bad that it is choking off the Upper Animas River\u2019s ecosystem.<\/p>\n
Since the spill, Silverton, a remote tourist hamlet high in the San Juan Mountains, has been in full-blown crisis. DeAnne Gallegos, director of the Silverton Area Chamber of Commerce, ruefully said that the financial pain caused by families canceling trips in light of the pollution had been offset by the influx of media and EPA employees.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe hotels are full,\u201d she said Thursday.<\/p>\n
With merely 500 residents in town this August, Gallegos said that to combat the bad international publicity and the media circus that descended last week on Silverton, the town and county governments drafted Silverton\u2019s lone county judge, Anthony Edwards, to act as the town\u2019s spokesman to the wider world. But explaining Silverton\u2019s continuing resistance to Superfund looked difficult even for Edwards, who said Thursday he wasn\u2019t aware of any current discussion between the town trustees or the county commissioners and the EPA about Superfund.<\/p>\n
\u201cThere\u2019s a fair group of people in the community who worry that if we were to be designated a Superfund area, it would impact the tourist economy here and result in a lack of lending for homes and businesses,\u201d Edwards said.<\/p>\n
Asked how the stigma of a Superfund designation could possibly injure Silverton more than the stigma attached to being the tiny town that for decades defied the EPA\u2019s pleading only to bestow millions of gallons of heavily polluted mine wastewater on downstream communities through Colorado, New Mexico and Utah, Edwards said, \u201cI don\u2019t know how to answer that.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI know some people are pointing the finger at the town of Silverton and San Juan County, but that\u2019s not necessarily fair,\u201d he said, saying the town and county had been working with the EPA on Animas River cleanup through the Animas River Stakeholders Group for decades. The stakeholders group is an organization dedicated to improving water quality in the river.<\/p>\n
The EPA first tried to make parts of Silverton a Superfund site in 1994 and place its draining mines on the National Priorities List, which would allow the agency to treat the mine waste as it saw fit while also holding mining companies financially responsible.<\/p>\n
Edwards acknowledged that while some people, including stakeholder members, believe the Gold King Mine spill could have been averted if the town had let the EPA declare its draining mines a Superfund site 20 years ago: \u201cThat\u2019s just speculation at this point. Hindsight is 20\/20,\u201d he said, before adding: \u201cThese aren\u2019t necessarily my views.\u201d<\/p>\n
But to people living outside Silverton who have been involved in the Animas River cleanup for decades, Silverton\u2019s anti-Superfund logic is torturous, and residents\u2019 attempts to blame the Gold King spill on the EPA rather than on mining companies is willfully incorrect.<\/p>\n
Robert Robinson, who used to represent the Bureau of Land Management in the stakeholder\u2019s group, said if Silverton had only embraced a Superfund designation 20 years ago, the mines poisoning the Animas would have been cleaned up by now.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf the EPA, BLM and (Colorado Department of Health and Public Environment) had gone after Kinross back in the day, Kinross would now be in the process of cleaning it up. But the EPA, in an attempt to be good guys and sensitive to the citizens of San Juan County, didn\u2019t. Now the cleanup is going to be at taxpayers\u2019 expense. Downstream people are outraged \u2013 and I agree with that camp.\u201d<\/p>\n
San Juan Corp. President Todd Hennis told The New York Times on Monday that Kinross is at fault for the spill. Kevin Roach, Sunnyside reclamation director, said in an email to The Associated Press on Tuesday that it had no role in the Gold King accident.<\/p>\n
The toll that Silverton\u2019s draining mines has taken on the Animas River\u2019s ecosystem has grown more deadly in recent years, killing off three out of the four trout species that lived in the Upper Animas River below Silverton between 2005 and 2010 and slashing its insect population.<\/p>\n
Robinson said most of the watersheds in Colorado have fish in them, including downstream from Superfund sites Summitville and Leadville. But there are no fish downstream from Silverton, he said.<\/p>\n
San Juan County Historical Society Chairwoman Bev Rich said residents\u2019 intransigent opposition to Superfund partially stems from locals\u2019 deep allegiance to the industry that built the town.<\/p>\n
\u201cThere\u2019s a lot of people who blame the demise of mining here on the EPA and mining regulations that have increased over the last century,\u201d Rich said.<\/p>\n
But, she added, in the wake of the Gold King spill, some locals\u2019 antipathy to Superfund and the EPA, far from diminishing, had grown increasingly virulent.<\/p>\n
\u201cNow there\u2019s a conspiracy theory going on,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n
On Greene Street, two of its local adherents who refused to be named, posited that the EPA deliberately triggered the Gold King disaster in order to finagle Superfunding Silverton; their smoking gun evidence was a letter to the editor of the Silverton Standard & Miner published one week before the spill in which the author, a Farmington geologist, predicted such a scheme unfolding.<\/p>\n
The Standard\u2019s editor, Mark Esper, said Silvertonians\u2019 Superfund conspiracy theory had spilled into the wider world. Esper was forced to leave his office last week because the cacophony of phone calls from media and bloggers about the letter to the editor was preventing him from getting any work done.<\/p>\n
That day, after years of editorializing about his hesitancy to favor a Superfund designation, Esper published an editorial in Thursday\u2019s Standard full-throatedly backing it: \u201cSuspicions of the EPA run deep in this community. But until I see a more viable alternative for dealing with this huge problem, this community in my view must endorse Superfund,\u201d he wrote.<\/p>\n
Intellectually and ethically, it\u2019s the right position, he told The Durango Herald.<\/p>\n
\u201cBut I might lose readers,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n