Greetings, stargazers.

I hope you are enjoying the change in weather. My December column has occasionally been used to list some things you might want to put on your astronomical observing wish list. This year that wish list might include a big cat.

Unless you have been shopping for one, you might not recognize “cat” as a term sometimes used for catadioptric telescope. These telescopes are simply ones that use both mirrors and lenses in various combinations to create an image.

The two main classes of telescopes are refractors, which use lenses to make an image, and reflectors, which use a large mirror to make an image. Both have their advantages and disadvantages. I have not been hesitant about my recommendation that beginners start with a good pair of binoculars, which are just a pair of small refractors. Or that Dobsonian-mounted Newtonian reflectors provide the best bang for the buck for casual observers.

Catadioptric telescopes come in several varieties that are targeted at amateur observers. The most common type is a Schmidt Cassegrain. The advantage of these telescopes is that they typically have much larger apertures, or light-gathering ability than comparably priced refractors. And they use a folded light path, so they are much more portable than a simple reflector of the same diameter. They can therefore be put on a much smaller tripod or tracking mount. Their portability is what makes them popular.

Catadioptric telescopes most often come with an electronic clock drive mechanism to allow you to find or follow your target object. Unfortunately adding one of these auto-finding drive mechanisms to a telescope can make the experience more complicated, with more time spent setting things up than observing.

Charles Hakes teaches in the physics and engineering department at Fort Lewis College and is the director of the Fort Lewis Observatory.